Tips for using crowdsourcing
Identify venue for soliciting response
Post an original document to spark feedback
Check every tip for accuracy
Don't cast too wide a net
Focus on a specific topic
Don't confuse passion with accuracy
Consider a confidential place for readers to send tips
A guide to ‘crowdsourcing’
Reader-supplied information and documents help nail
down stories
"Crowdsourcing" is a great-sounding phrase that actually
means what it says: Ask the crowds for information.
To Skip Hidlay, executive editor of Gannett Company's Asbury Park Press in New Jersey,
the term means "calling on citizens to help the reporter fully report
the story."
To Matt Reed, an assistant managing editor at a sister
newspaper, Florida Today, it means "asking
your readers, or your audience, to help you solve a problem."
To everyday volunteer journalists, or people who write
for citizen media, it can mean widening your circle of
information-gathering beyond your own phone or e-mail. You not only
open the door to generating news tips, you also can get help verifying
information in hand. WIRED magazine's Jeff Howe covers the
growth of crowdsourcing, in journalism and beyond, closely in
his blog.
Crowdsourcing at work
Let's look again at Florida Today. (Full disclosure: Amy
Eisman, who developed this module, has co-authored training modules for
Gannett). Editors at the paper, based on the east coast of central
Florida, had received a tip claiming that homeowners were being charged
too much for storm insurance premiums.
"Share what you know"
That's the motto for Minnesota Public
Radio's Public
Insight Network initiative. Citizens are invited to
contribute thoughts on everything from the trade of a popular
basketball star to the state's budget. After asking for Minnesotans'
input on the economic recovery in 2004, the network used stories and
comments from nearly 100 citizens who responded to a targeted e-mail
query to provide the foundation for a multi-part
series.

Reed, the assistant managing editor, knew the reporting
team needed documentation, but insurance policies are not part of the
public record.
So he turned to his
blog, where he asked homeowners to share their insurance
experiences. He also requested copies of policies.
The paper received hundreds of tips, and at least two
dozen readers allowed reporters to bring appraisers into their homes.
Journalists found the verification they needed. "Companies were
methodically overstating these things," Reed says of the policies. The
story made front-page news. One of its conclusions: Homeowners were
being overcharged by as much as $600.
Hidlay's New Jersey staff also uses information from
readers to help the newspaper extend its reporting.
"A lot of times, the challenge as a reporter is how do
you get inside knowledge," Hidlay says. Crowdsourcing "is a
particularly effective tool when you have people inside an organization
who may not be reachable through normal channels by a reporter."
Crowdsourcing can be risky
Hidlay's "best advice is to put the word out in some
fashion, through (your) printed paper or the Web." Florida Today, for example, has a watchdog section that solicits information from readers.
But an open call for tips comes with
a serious warning.
"When tips come in you treat them like any other tip or
lead," Hidlay says. "We never use anything given to us by
crowdsourcing raw. Verify.
Verify. Verify."
"At the heart of
journalism is accuracy."
— Rich Gordon,
Northwestern University
He recalled one recent investigation of a major homebuilder. The paper
had two reporters working the story full time for three months,
collecting and posting documents, as well as checking tips sent in by
readers. Only "one out of every three" was right, Hidlay says.
Rich Gordon, director of digital media in education at
the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University, says this
emphasis on checking information applies to citizen media
sites as well as professional news sites.
"Any journalist who's ever covered a small community
knows that some of the most active and vocal citizens are also, shall
we say, some of the loosest cannons," Gordon writes in an e-mail. "What
they say may be completely wrong and, even when right, they can get
obsessive and difficult. Working journalists usually have developed an
approach to dealing with folks like this, which often amounts to
ignoring them. Which they do at their peril, because just sometimes
these folks are absolutely right."
Hidlay puts it simply: "Citizen volunteers have to
understand that the heart of journalism is accuracy. You can't take
shortcuts."
Advice for citizen journalists
Of course, Florida Today and Asbury Park Press are
professionally staffed newsrooms. So think hard about what you can take
on. Longtime newsman Gordon Joseloff, who founded WestportNow.com,
chooses instead to focus on training writers rather than creating a
database of information in the crowdsourcing sense: "We don't have the
staff to compile a lot of that," he says.
Medill's Gordon likewise says focus is key. He says The
News-Press in Fort Myers, Fla., successfully launched an investigation
because "they knew they were interested in some developers, so they
invited people to share what they knew."
"Sharing" is also the word at American Public Media and Minnesota Public Radio,
where the four-year-old Public Insight Journalism initiative has drawn
input from 30,000 sources and produced about 250 stories based on their
collective insight.
When producers have specific ideas, or want to explore a
topic, they send an e-mail query linking to a short online survey, says Andrew Haeg, senior
producer. The e-mails are private. Topics can range from economy and
health care to travel, with lots more in between.
"It reverses the process of going to the experts first,"
says Haeg, who turned to the network to explore whether the economic
recovery a few years back really covered everyone. (It didn't; see the story.)
"We received 100 responses in our network from all over the state."
'Open up'
Haeg couches his advice in two ways. One is aimed at
traditional newsrooms, which he thinks should open up to the public,
rethink old mindsets and embrace broader views of the world.
The other is for CitJ sites to consider partnering with
traditional media who may have the expertise to build the gathered
information into a wider narrative. Sometimes the citizen publisher
does not have enough time or resources to "take those germs of an idea
and build them out," he says.
To both sides, he says, "drop your prejudices." Working
together can help serve the community.
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment on this page!